With the untimely death of the New York Mets 2019 season, I’ve had time to catch up on some reading these past few weeks.
I realize, now, that all these recent reads have been non-fiction titles – and that last week, on the first Thursday in November, much of the world celebrated
#NationalNonfictionDay.
For children.
While many great reads were suggested for young adults on social media last week, let me offer a few non-fiction titles reviewed for adults.
They are filled with words that are heavy with nothing but trouble: Weinstein to Hart to Nabokov.
Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators by
Ronan Farrow
My rating:
5 of 5 stars
After reading this book, I can’t even…
I can’t even believe the breadth and depth of Harvey Weinstein’s behavior – or his enablers.
I can’t even believe that NBC News refuses to conduct an independent investigation of how it botched the handling of this story.
I can’t even express how much I admire the tenacity and talent of Ronan Farrow.
Like
“Bad Blood,” “Catch and Kill” is another great work of investigative journalism. It is an outstanding read, chronicling the abuse of power. It was the best book I read all month… and so far this year.
The Front Runner by
Matt Bai
My rating:
4 of 5 stars
This book – originally titled “All the Truth Is Out” – is an earnest recounting of Gary Hart’s place in history.
I read it after recently watching an earnest movie adaptation.
The movie was OK. To be honest, I didn’t enjoy the book any better than I enjoyed the movie. Earnest is not my cup of tea. I prefer Ernest, as in Hemingway. Also, I’m not a big fan of politicians.
Still, I am a big fan of journalists, and it’s hard not to be impressed by author Matt Bai, who, until recently, wrote political columns for Yahoo News.
Until recently, I was a media relations director for Yahoo’s corporate parent, Verizon.
Bai’s world and mine never collided. Even though we both received paychecks from the same company, the writers and editors who worked on Yahoo, TechCrunch, Engadget, HuffPo and other Verizon-owned media properties were never, as far as I could ever tell, interfered with by their corporate parent. In this way, Verizon was more supportive of journalists than, say, NBC News was of Ronan Farrow.
On both sides (corporate and publishing), we valued objectivity and professionalism. And humanity. Every time TechCrunch mentioned Verizon in a post, it added an editor’s note describing the company as the site’s “corporate overlord.”
This was as it should be. At one point, we in Verizon’s communications department even thought of purchasing “Corporate Overlord” t-shirts as a team-builder, but some PR issue or another diverted our attention.
All of which is to say that I do not pretend I can research, write and provide context as well as Bai and his colleagues.
I’m just a lowly reader, but this book didn’t engage or excite me.
That is, except for two redeeming scenes: the recounting of two of the author’s interactions with Gary Hart that gave me goosebumps.
I’ll write more about one scene when I turn to Nabokov. For now, take it from me, the final pages of Bai’s book are evocative and profound.
There’s a question left hanging as the book ends, delicately suspended in mid-air, described with extraordinary perspective and heartache.
Bravo, says the former corporate overlord. Bravo, I say again, for what it’s worth.
The Real Lolita: The Kidnapping of Sally Horner and the Novel that Scandalized the World by
Sarah Weinman
My rating:
3 of 5 stars
The title says it all here, especially the breathless part about “the novel that scandalized the world.”
This is basically a solid true crime story about a heartbreaking tale of the 1948 abduction of an 11-year-old girl from Camden, NJ.
I’m glad that Sarah Weinman told this tale with such empathy and thoroughness. Where the book loses me is that, throughout, the author is shocked… SHOCKED… that Vladimir Nabokov might have had some knowledge of this crime when writing “Lolita.”
Nabokov makes one parenthetical reference to Sally Horner in “Lolita,” and a thorough vetting of his estate yielded one reference to her among the thousands of legendary index cards he used for notetaking and organization. This should hardly be surprising. It’s the 1950s version of finding a link in someone’s comprehensive browsing history.
Weinman uses this slim reed to indict, and even mock (see Vladimir chasing butterflies in his funny clothes; see his beleaguered wife Vera try to protect his image like a corporate PR director) the author for crass exploitation of a sex crime.
I don’t know how much Nabokov knew about Sally Horner and, frankly, I don’t care.
I also don’t need Weinman to tell me that “Lolita” is exploitative at its core.
There was a time in my life – when I was a sophomore at Notre Dame and read the book for the first time – that I was enamored with its art.
There was, in fact, the Saturday night someone drove a group of us the few miles from South Bend, IN, to Niles, MI, where the legal drinking age was 18.
I wound up drunk at a dive bar, reciting the opening lines of “Lolita” by heart. That should tell you all you need to know about my prospects for dating during college, and how much I loved that book.
I’m insufferable that way. Still. When a friend recently asked why I had pursued another PR job rather than retire after leaving Verizon, I winced as I realized I was semi-quoting lines from “Annie Hall,” written by Farrow’s father:
Annie: The people here are wonderful. I mean, you know, they just watch movies all day.
Alvy: Yeah, and gradually you get old and die. You know it’s important to make a little effort once in a while.
I once loved... no,
lurved... “Annie Hall,” but lately I can’t stomach watching Woody Allen movies. I’ve long since cleared my house of his books.
It’s because I’ve grown up.
I now regard Nabokov’s pretty words as nothing more than pedophilia played out in prostitution, threats and manipulation, as Lolita cried herself to sleep every night.
---------
In Matt Bai’s book “The Front Runner,” the author is conversing with Gary Hart many years after his PR debacle.
Hart is reexamining his life and quoting from, of all things, the New Testament.
He can’t quite shake the implications of Jesus’ parable of the talents. Hart wonders aloud to a journalist if perhaps he hadn’t put to best use all his God-given abilities and blessings. Then he almost begins to cry.
I feel that way about myself most days. I feel that way about Nabokov too.
What if Nabokov had written a bold and insightful story about someone like Hart – or the homeless woman I just passed on the street? What great work of art could Nabokov have produced on the theme of the manipulation of power among adults, perhaps in terms of a character like Harvey Weinstein?
What if he had simply written about the intersection of life and baseball?
Extra Innings:
Can't Anybody Here Play This Game?: The Improbable Saga of the New York Mets' First Year by
Jimmy Breslin
My rating:
4 of 5 stars
As I discovered this past weekend, a non-stop plane ride from New York to the heart of middle America is the exact amount of time it takes someone like me to read this short book by Jimmy Breslin, whose writing is an acquired taste.
In 1963, only five years after the American publication of “Lolita,” Breslin wrote about the intersection of life and baseball.
He wrote about the 1962 New York Mets. My sin, my soul.
Let’s-go-Mets: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of only one step to end, at three, by howling at the moon. Let’s. Go. Mets.
The Mets, in the immortal words of Breslin, are losers – just like nearly everybody else in life.
This book is about the most poetic season of the most poetic team in the most poetic of sports. It’s recommended reading, full of life’s wisdom.
These days, I enjoyed it more than “Lolita,” although not as much as I enjoyed and appreciated Ronan Farrow’s book about Harvey Weinstein. I don’t know what that says about my life. I must be a loser too.
Look at this tangle of thorns.
View all my Goodreads reviews
